Business Analysis as a Service (BAaaS)
High-impact BA support for financial services change programmes. Expert BRDs, FRDs, NFRs, user stories, requirements traceability, and UAT strategy.
90-minute working session · Senior practitioners only · No deck, no pitch
Get Expert BA Support
On-demand business analysis for your projects
Senior practitioners only · No deck · No pitch
What you get from an Insight Centric engagement
Six things that distinguish how we work from a traditional advisory engagement.
Governance-first
Embedded three-lines-of-defence, audit-defensible by design — not retrofitted at the gate.
Supervisory-ready
Designed to satisfy PRA SS1/23, FCA SYSC, EU AI Act, DORA, BCBS 239 and adjacent frameworks on first reading.
Senior practitioners only
No pyramid model. The people who diagnose the work are the people who do the work.
Workflow-shaped
We rebuild the production function, not just the technology stack — workflows, data layers, decision rights, and roles.
Operating-model integrated
Every engagement lands as part of your operating model, not as a parallel programme that has to be maintained separately.
Evidence as by-product
Decision logs, lineage, override traces, and validation evidence captured automatically as the work happens.
How a typical engagement runs
Three phases. Sequenced, not optional. Each phase produces work that the next phase builds on.
Diagnostic
Honest current-state mapping, regulatory triage, and a defensibility memo on highest-risk in-production systems.
Strategy & Blueprint
Future-state operating model, redesigned priority workflow, data architecture, decision rights, and a sequenced roadmap.
Activation & Delivery
Embedded delivery alongside your operations, technology, and risk teams. Data layer first, then workflow, then governance instrumentation.
Delivering clarity, precision, and control to complex financial services programmes
Financial institutions need flawless business analysis to deliver regulatory, operational, and systems change successfully. Poor requirements lead to rework, failed UAT, and budget overruns. I provide Tier-1 quality BA services that keep programmes on track.
Is this you?
- Missing or unclear requirements causing confusion and rework
- Failed UAT because requirements weren't clear or testable
- Budget creep and overruns due to scope changes
- Production defects from incomplete functional specifications
- Stakeholder misalignment - everyone has a different understanding
- Low-quality documentation that doesn't pass audit or governance
If these sound familiar, you need expert business analysis support.
What I deliver
Business Requirements Documents (BRDs)
- Business context - Why this change matters
- Stakeholder needs - What each group requires
- Success criteria - How we measure delivery
- Dependencies - What relies on what
Functional Requirements Documents (FRDs)
- Detailed functional specs - Exactly what the system must do
- Process flows - How the solution works end-to-end
- Business rules - Logic, calculations, validations
- Integration requirements - How systems connect
Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs)
- Performance - Volume, speed, latency targets
- Security & access control - Who can do what
- Audit & compliance - Regulatory needs
- Data retention & archiving - How long data lives
User Stories & Acceptance Criteria
- Agile-ready stories - "As a [user], I need [capability], so that [benefit]"
- Acceptance criteria - Clear pass/fail conditions
- Story mapping - Prioritization and release planning
Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM)
- Full traceability - Business need → requirement → test case
- Impact analysis - What changes affect what
- Regulatory mapping - Which requirements meet which regulations
Gap Analysis (Current vs. Future State)
- As-is analysis - What exists today
- To-be design - What's needed
- Gap identification - What must change
- Solution options - Build vs. buy vs. configure
Stakeholder Workshop Facilitation
- Requirements elicitation - Uncovering the real needs
- Consensus building - Aligning conflicting stakeholders
- JAD sessions - Joint Application Design workshops
- Show & tell - Demo and feedback loops
Test Strategy, UAT Approach & Test Scripts
- Test strategy - SIT, UAT, regression approach
- UAT test scripts - Scenario-based, traceable to requirements
- Test data requirements - What data is needed for testing
- Defect triage - How to prioritize and resolve issues
What this solves
Missing or Unclear Requirements
Capture complete, unambiguous requirements that developers can implement confidently.
Rework, Overruns & Budget Creep
Get it right the first time with clear, testable, traceable requirements.
Failed UAT or Production Defects
Write acceptance criteria that ensure the solution meets business needs before go-live.
Low-Quality Documentation
Deliver audit-ready, governance-compliant artefacts that regulators and stakeholders trust.
Deliverables
You receive Tier-1 bank quality BA documentation:
Business Requirements Documents (BRDs)
Functional Requirements Documents (FRDs)
Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs)
User Stories & Acceptance Criteria
Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM)
Gap Analysis (Current vs. Future State)
Functional/Data Mapping Specifications
Test Strategy & UAT Scripts
All in Confluence, Word, Excel, JIRA, or your preferred format.
Who this is for
- Investment Banks - Trading platforms, risk systems, regulatory reporting
- Commercial Banks - Payments, core banking, digital channels
- Asset Managers - Fund accounting, order management, compliance systems
- Broker-Dealers - Trade processing, settlement, reconciliation platforms
- Regulatory Programmes - ECB, PRA, FCA change initiatives
Typical engagement
Week 1-2: Discovery & Requirements Elicitation
- Stakeholder interviews (business, operations, IT, risk)
- Current state analysis
- Requirement workshops
- Documentation of initial requirements
Week 3-6: Requirements Documentation
- BRD, FRD, NFR creation
- User story development
- Requirements traceability matrix
- Review cycles with stakeholders
Week 7-8: UAT Preparation & Handover
- Test strategy and UAT approach
- UAT test script creation
- Requirements sign-off
- Handover to development/testing teams
Engagement models
Every business analysis engagement is scoped to the depth of the programme, the regulatory environment, and the quality standards required for governance and audit review. We commit to pricing transparently once we understand your situation.
- Project-based BA engagement (4–10 weeks) — Full BA lifecycle from discovery through to UAT on a defined scope, with audit-defensible deliverables.
- Embedded BA resource — Senior BA support on a time-and-materials basis for ongoing programme delivery.
- BA sprint support — Structured support for agile programmes that need methodical, audit-ready requirements documentation.
For a detailed breakdown of our engagement shapes and a scope-and-budget conversation form, see our engagements page.
Real results
Tier-1 Investment Bank (Risk Platform Upgrade)
Challenge: Unclear requirements causing rework, 3-month delay, failed SIT
Delivered: Complete FRD, NFRs, RTM, UAT scripts, stakeholder alignment
Result: Successful go-live on revised timeline, zero critical defects
European Commercial Bank (Payments Hub Migration)
Challenge: Missing requirements for regulatory reporting, audit concerns
Delivered: BRD with full regulatory mapping, data lineage, test strategy
Result: Regulatory requirements met, audit approval, smooth migration
Start here
Free: Requirements Quality Review
Send me your current requirements document (BRD, FRD, or backlog). I'll send back a 10-minute Loom with:
- What's missing or unclear
- Key risks and gaps
- Quick wins for improvement
How we typically structure an engagement
- Requirements Sprint (3–4 weeks) — BRD or FRD for a defined scope, user stories with acceptance criteria, requirements traceability, stakeholder workshops, review and sign-off
- Full BA Programme (8–10 weeks) — Complete BA lifecycle: BRD, FRD, NFR documentation, user stories and RTM, gap analysis, test strategy, UAT scripts, stakeholder facilitation, sign-off and handover
- Embedded BA resource — Senior practitioner embedded alongside your programme team for ongoing requirements, documentation, and stakeholder management support
Engagements are scoped per client. For the engagement shapes we use and a comprehensive FAQ on how we scope, see our engagements page.
Why partner with us
Tier-1 institutional experience — Delivered BA work on major transformation programmes across investment and commercial banks
Regulatory fluency — Deep understanding of ECB, PRA, and FCA documentation requirements
Methodologically disciplined — Comfortable with waterfall, agile, and hybrid delivery, always producing audit-defensible artefacts
Audit-defensible quality — Documentation that passes governance review on first pass
Rigorous, evidence-based delivery — Requirements grounded in stakeholder discovery, not assumption
What makes great BA work
Bad BA work:
- Vague "nice to have" statements
- No acceptance criteria or testability
- Missing non-functionals (performance, security)
- No traceability to business needs
- Stakeholders still confused
Great BA work:
- Clear, unambiguous, testable requirements
- Full traceability (business need → requirement → test)
- Comprehensive NFRs (regulatory, performance, security)
- Stakeholder consensus and sign-off
- UAT scripts that validate delivery
- Developers know exactly what to build
Next steps
- Free Review - Send me your current requirements doc
- Discovery Call - 30-minute discussion of your programme
- Proposal - Scoped BA engagement with clear deliverables
- Kick-off - Start requirements analysis in week 1
What the work actually looks like
We do not publish customer logos, named testimonials, or quotable client praise. The institutions we work with are operating under PRA, FCA, and equivalent supervisory expectations and the work is commercially sensitive. Instead, we publish anonymised case studies that walk through the engagement structure, the diagnostic findings, what we redesigned across the five enablement pillars, and the outcomes that landed.
Read the case studiesFrequently Asked Questions
Got questions? We've got answers.
How long does a typical engagement take?
A focused Diagnostic is 4 weeks. The full Strategy & Blueprint is 10–14 weeks. A Transformation Programme runs 9–18 months. A complete AI Enablement arc — diagnostic through to multiple workflows redesigned and operating in production — typically takes 24–36 months. Anyone promising shorter has either scoped down the work or does not understand what they are committing to.
Which industries do you serve?
We are concentrated in regulated industries where the structural opportunity is largest and the governance bar is highest. Our deepest expertise is in financial services (banking, insurance, asset management, wealth, capital markets, payments), and we work across healthcare and life sciences, energy and utilities, and public sector. The structural framework is the same in each — five enablement pillars, embedded governance, sequenced delivery — but the regulatory frame and the value streams are tailored to your sector.
What deliverables will we receive?
Audit-defensible artefacts that satisfy supervisory review on first reading: BPMN 2.0 workflow maps, action-data layer architecture, decision rights matrices, governance frameworks (three-lines-of-defence for AI), embedded second-line risk evidence, and sequenced implementation roadmaps. Everything is version-controlled and reusable across adjacent workflows.
How involved are you with our team?
Embedded. We work alongside your operations, technology, risk, and compliance functions throughout the engagement. We do not deliver a deck and leave. The goal is that by the end of the engagement, your team owns the redesigned workflow and the supporting operating model — and we are no longer needed to run it.
Ready for a real conversation?
Book a 90-minute executive working session with a senior practitioner. No deck. No pitch. We use the time to understand your operating model, the binding constraints, and which engagement is the right one to start with.
Book a working session90 minutes · Senior practitioners only · No deck, no pitch