Change Impact Assessment Toolkit

What is Change Impact Assessment?

Change Impact Assessment (CIA) is a structured process to identify, analyse, and plan for the effects of a proposed change on your organisation. It answers the question: "If we make this change, what else will be affected?"

Why Change Impact Assessment Matters

Without Impact Assessment: -Unintended consequences and hidden costs -Scope creep and budget overruns -Inadequate stakeholder engagement -Failed implementations and user resistance -Regulatory breaches due to overlooked impacts

With Impact Assessment:

  • Comprehensive understanding of change implications
  • Realistic budget and timeline estimates
  • Proactive stakeholder management
  • Smooth implementation with user buy-in
  • Reduced risk and increased success rate

Change Impact Assessment Framework

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CHANGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK                          │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

STEP 1: DEFINE THE CHANGE
• What is changing? (scope)
• Why is it changing? (business case)
• When is it changing? (timeline)

STEP 2: IDENTIFY IMPACTED AREAS
• People (roles, skills, behaviours)
• Process (workflows, procedures)
• Technology (systems, data, interfaces)
• Organisation (structure, governance)
• Customers (experience, communications)

STEP 3: ASSESS IMPACT SEVERITY
• Rate each impact (High/Medium/Low)
• Quantify where possible (cost, effort, time)

STEP 4: ANALYSE DEPENDENCIES
• What must happen before this change?
• What is blocked by this change?
• What else changes as a result?

STEP 5: DEVELOP MITIGATION PLAN
• Actions to reduce negative impacts
• Contingency plans for risks
• Change management approach

STEP 6: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
• Identify affected stakeholders
• Communication plan
• Training and support needs

STEP 7: APPROVAL AND SIGN-OFF
• Present impact assessment to governance
• Obtain approvals
• Document decisions

Impact Assessment Template

Section 1: Change Overview

CHANGE ID: CHG-2025-001
CHANGE TITLE: Implement Real-Time Trade Surveillance System
CHANGE TYPE: Technology Implementation
CHANGE SPONSOR: Chief Compliance Officer
REQUESTED BY: FCA Regulatory Review
DATE: 15 January 2025

CHANGE DESCRIPTION:
Replace batch-based trade surveillance system with real-time surveillance
platform to detect market abuse within 1 minute of execution (vs T+1 today).

BUSINESS JUSTIFICATION:
• FCA identified current system as inadequate (T+1 detection too slow)
• Reduce false positive rate from 85% to <20%
• Free up 30 hours/week of analyst time
• Demonstrate continuous improvement to regulator

SUCCESS CRITERIA:
• Real-time detection (<1 minute latency)
• False positive rate <20%
• Zero false negatives (100% detection of suspicious activity)
• Go-live by Q2 2025 (before FCA inspection)

BUDGET: £250k
TIMELINE: 20 weeks (Jan - May 2025)

Section 2: Impact Analysis by Dimension

2.1 People Impact

Stakeholder GroupImpactSeverityDetailsMitigation
Surveillance Analysts (2 FTE)New system, new workflowsHIGH• Must learn new UI and workflows
• Change from reviewing batch alerts to real-time triage
• Skills gap: need training on risk scoring
• 3-day training programme
• Parallel run for 4 weeks
• Daily support during hypercare
Compliance ManagerNew dashboards and reportsMEDIUM• Must monitor different KPIs (response time, risk scores)
• New escalation process
• Weekly review meetings
• Custom dashboard design
IT Support TeamNew system to supportMEDIUM• 24/7 support required (vs batch job today)
• New monitoring tools
• Runbook creation
• On-call rota established
MLRODifferent alert formatLOW• Alert escalations formatted differently• Demo session
• Updated escalation template

Summary:

  • Total FTE impacted: 8 people
  • Training required: 2 days per person (analyst), 1 day (others)
  • Change resistance risk: MEDIUM (analysts concerned about real-time pressure)
  • Mitigation: Early engagement, pilot with 1 analyst, emphasise efficiency gains

2.2 Process Impact

ProcessCurrent StateFuture StateImpactChanges Required
Alert ReviewBatch: Analysts review 850 alerts per day in end-of-day queueReal-time: Analysts triage alerts as they arrive, prioritised by risk scoreHIGH• New procedure: real-time triage
• New SLA: High-risk alerts within 4 hours
• New escalation: Auto-escalate if SLA breached
Alert InvestigationManual review of trade data from multiple systemsConsolidated view in new UI with all contextMEDIUM• Updated investigation checklist
• New evidence capture process
Case EscalationEmail to MLRO with Excel attachmentAutomated case creation in ActimizeMEDIUM• Integration testing
• Updated RACI (system creates case, not analyst)
ReportingWeekly report to Board: Alert volumes, false positive rateDaily report + Weekly Board report: Alert volumes, SLA compliance, risk scoresLOW• New report template
• Automated report generation

Process Maps:

  • As-Is BPMN created
  • To-Be BPMN created
  • Gap analysis in progress
  • New procedures to be drafted (due: Week 8)

2.3 Technology Impact

SystemImpactDetailsIntegration Required?Owner
Fidessa OMSSOURCE: Trade data feedMust provide real-time trade data via Kafka (vs batch today)YES: New Kafka producerIT + OMS Vendor
ThetaRay (NEW)NEW SYSTEM: Real-time surveillanceNew platform to be implementedN/A (new)IT + ThetaRay
ActimizeTARGET: Case managementReceive escalated alerts via APIYES: New API integrationIT + Actimize Vendor
HR SystemSOURCE: Trader reference dataProvide trader names, desk assignmentsYES: Daily batch fileIT
BloombergSOURCE: Market dataProvide reference prices for validationYES: API integrationIT + Bloomberg

Infrastructure Requirements:

  • AWS cloud environment (2 EC2 instances, RDS database, S3 storage)
  • Kafka message queue (new)
  • Network firewall rules for vendor access

Data Migration:

  • Historical alerts (last 12 months) to be migrated for trend analysis
  • Estimated 500,000 records
  • Migration window: Week 12-13

2.4 Data Impact

Data ElementImpactCurrentFutureData Quality Risk
Trade DataReal-time ingestionBatch file (end-of-day)Kafka stream (real-time)Potential latency or message loss if Kafka unavailable
Trader Reference DataEnrichment requiredManual lookupAuto-enrichment from HR systemMissing traders if HR system not updated
Alert DataNew structureSimple alert logRisk score + ML featuresMust ensure risk score is explainable for regulators
Case DataIntegration with ActimizeManual Excel exportAutomated APIAPI failures could block escalations

Data Retention:

  • Alert data: 7 years (regulatory requirement)
  • Archived to S3 Glacier after 1 year

Data Privacy:

  • Trade data contains personal data (trader names)
  • GDPR compliance: Data processing agreement with ThetaRay

2.5 Organisation Impact

DimensionImpactDetails
Roles & ResponsibilitiesRACI changes• New role: Real-Time Surveillance Lead (1 FTE hire)
• Existing analysts shift from batch review to real-time triage
• IT team accountable for 24/7 system availability
GovernanceNew committee• Surveillance Steering Committee (monthly) to review KPIs, tune rules
• Members: CCO, Compliance Manager, MLRO, IT Lead
PoliciesUpdated policies• Market Abuse Policy: Update to reflect real-time monitoring
• Data Retention Policy: Update to include new alert data
Reporting LinesNo changeCompliance structure unchanged

2.6 Customer/External Impact

StakeholderImpactDetailsCommunication Plan
FCA (Regulator)Positive: Demonstrates improvementEnhanced surveillance capabilityQuarterly update to FCA supervisor
ClientsNoneNo client-facing changesN/A
Third-Party VendorsNew contractsThetaRay (software), AWS (infrastructure)Procurement process initiated

Section 3: Risk Assessment

RiskImpactLikelihoodScoreMitigation
ML model produces unexpected resultsHIGHMEDIUMHIGH• Parallel run with old system for 12 weeks
• Manual override capability
• Weekly model performance review
Real-time feed from OMS unstableHIGHLOWMEDIUM• Retain batch fallback
• Message queue buffering
• SLA with OMS vendor
Analysts resist new systemMEDIUMMEDIUMMEDIUM• Early user involvement in design
• Pilot with 1 analyst first
• Emphasise efficiency gains
Integration with Actimize failsMEDIUMLOWLOW• Manual case creation fallback
• Retry mechanism with alerting
Budget overrunMEDIUMLOWLOW• Fixed-price contract with ThetaRay
• 10% contingency budget
Timeline delay (miss FCA inspection)CRITICALLOWMEDIUM• Weekly steering committee
• Fast-track approval process
• Vendor SLAs with penalties

Section 4: Dependencies

Pre-requisites (must complete before this change):

  1. FCA approval for real-time surveillance approach
  2. Budget approval (£250k)
  3. Kafka infrastructure provisioning (due: Week 2)
  4. ThetaRay contract signed (due: Week 1)
  5. Real-Time Surveillance Lead hired (due: Week 4)

Dependent Changes (blocked by this change):

  • Expansion of surveillance to FX trading (deferred to Phase 2, Q3 2025)
  • Integration with trade reporting system (deferred to Q4 2025)

Concurrent Changes (happening in parallel):

  • T+1 settlement project (separate programme, some resource overlap)
  • OMS upgrade (potential conflict: need OMS stable during surveillance go-live)

Section 5: Stakeholder Analysis

StakeholderInterestInfluenceAttitudeEngagement Strategy
CCO (Sponsor)HIGHHIGHCHAMPIONWeekly 1:1, steering committee chair
Compliance ManagerHIGHHIGHSUPPORTIVEDaily stand-ups, UAT lead
Surveillance AnalystsHIGHMEDIUMNEUTRAL/RESISTANTEarly involvement, pilot participant, training
MLROMEDIUMHIGHSUPPORTIVEMonthly reviews, escalation workflow design
CTOMEDIUMHIGHNEUTRALFortnightly tech reviews, architecture sign-off
FCAHIGHHIGHSUPPORTIVEQuarterly updates, demo at readiness assessment
IT Support TeamMEDIUMLOWNEUTRALTraining on new system, runbook co-creation

Stakeholder Engagement Plan:

  • Pre-Launch: Town hall (all staff, Week 1), Q&A sessions (analysts, Week 2-4)
  • During Build: Weekly demos to analysts, fortnightly steering committee
  • Pre-Go-Live: UAT with analysts (Week 16-18), sign-off meetings
  • Post-Go-Live: Daily stand-ups (Week 20-22), hypercare support

Section 6: Change Management Plan

Communication Plan

AudienceMessageChannelFrequencyOwner
All Compliance Staff"New real-time surveillance system launching Q2 2025"Email + Town HallWeek 1, then monthly updatesCCO
Surveillance Analysts"Detailed walkthroughs of new system and workflows"WorkshopsWeekly during Weeks 2-18Compliance Manager
Exec Committee"Progress updates on regulatory change programme"Steering CommitteeMonthlyCCO
FCA"Enhanced surveillance capability demonstration"Scheduled callQuarterlyCCO

Training Plan

AudienceTrainingDurationFormatSchedule
Surveillance AnalystsNew system UI, workflows, risk scoring3 daysClassroom + hands-onWeek 16-17
Compliance ManagerDashboards, reporting, rule tuning2 daysClassroom + hands-onWeek 16
IT SupportSystem architecture, monitoring, troubleshooting2 daysTechnical deep-diveWeek 15
MLROAlert escalation process, new case format1 hourDemo sessionWeek 18

Resistance Management

Expected Sources of Resistance:

  1. Analysts: Fear of real-time pressure, loss of control
  2. IT: Concerned about 24/7 support burden
  3. Some managers: Comfortable with current process

Mitigation Strategies:

  1. Early Involvement: Include analysts in design workshops (co-create workflows)
  2. Pilot Approach: Test with 1 analyst first, refine based on feedback
  3. Emphasise Benefits: Highlight 75% reduction in false positives (less work)
  4. Support: Provide 4 weeks of daily support during hypercare
  5. Quick Wins: Demonstrate early efficiency gains (faster investigations)

Section 7: Implementation Approach

Phased Rollout

Phase 1: Pilot (Weeks 16-17)

  • Single analyst, single trading desk
  • Run in parallel with old system
  • Gather feedback, refine workflows

Phase 2: Expanded Pilot (Weeks 18-19)

  • All analysts, all desks
  • Continue parallel run
  • Final refinements

Phase 3: Go-Live (Week 20)

  • Switch to new system as primary
  • Old system retained as fallback for 4 weeks
  • Daily monitoring and support

Phase 4: Hypercare (Weeks 20-23)

  • Daily stand-ups with analysts
  • Rapid issue resolution
  • Performance monitoring

Phase 5: BAU Handover (Week 24)

  • System stable, users confident
  • Handover to BAU support team
  • Post-implementation review

Rollback Plan

Trigger for Rollback:

  • System unavailability >4 hours during trading day
  • False negative detected (missed genuine market abuse)
  • User rejection (majority of analysts cannot use system effectively)

Rollback Steps:

  1. Decision to rollback made by CCO + CTO
  2. Re-enable batch surveillance system (takes 1 hour)
  3. Notify all users, FCA (if material)
  4. Root cause analysis + remediation plan
  5. Re-plan go-live

Section 8: Cost-Benefit Analysis

Costs

Cost CategoryAmountNotes
Software (ThetaRay)£150k3-year license
Implementation Services£60kVendor professional services
AWS Infrastructure£20k/yearCloud hosting
Training£10kExternal trainer
Headcount (Surveillance Lead)£70k/yearNew hire
Contingency (10%)£25kBuffer for unforeseen costs
TOTAL£335k (Year 1)£160k/year ongoing

Benefits (3-Year)

BenefitValueNotes
Analyst Time Savings£180k/year30 hours/week × £60/hour × 50 weeks
Regulatory Risk Reduction£500k (one-time)Avoid potential FCA fine
Reduced False Positives£120k/year70% reduction in wasted effort
TOTAL 3-YEAR£1.4MNPV (10% discount): £920k

ROI: 174% (3-year) Payback: 18 months

Section 9: Success Metrics

MetricBaselineTargetMeasurement
Detection LatencyT+1 (24 hours)<1 minuteSystem monitoring
False Positive Rate85%<20%Monthly reporting
SLA ComplianceN/A (no SLA today)>95% (High-risk <4 hours)Dashboard tracking
System Availability95% (batch)99.5% (real-time)AWS CloudWatch
User SatisfactionN/A>4.0/5.0Post-implementation survey
Analyst Efficiency45 min/alert<15 min/alertTime tracking

Section 10: Approval and Sign-Off

ApproverRoleApproval CriterionStatusDate
CCOSponsorBusiness case approvedAPPROVED15 Jan 2025
CTOTechnical AuthorityArchitecture approvedAPPROVED18 Jan 2025
CFOBudgetBudget approvedAPPROVED20 Jan 2025
CRORiskRisk assessment approvedAPPROVED22 Jan 2025
Exec CommitteeFinal ApprovalProgramme approvedPENDING30 Jan 2025

Impact Assessment Checklist

Discovery Phase

  • Change clearly defined (scope, timeline, budget)
  • Business justification documented
  • Stakeholders identified
  • Current state documented (process maps, system diagrams)

Impact Analysis Phase

  • People impact assessed (roles, skills, training)
  • Process impact assessed (workflows, procedures)
  • Technology impact assessed (systems, data, integrations)
  • Organisation impact assessed (structure, governance)
  • Customer/external impact assessed
  • Dependencies identified (pre-requisites, dependent changes)
  • Risks identified and mitigation plans created

Planning Phase

  • Change management plan created
  • Communication plan created
  • Training plan created
  • Implementation approach defined (phased, big-bang, pilot)
  • Rollback plan created
  • Success metrics defined

Approval Phase

  • Impact assessment reviewed with stakeholders
  • Approvals obtained (sponsor, technical, budget, risk)
  • Governance approval (exec committee, board)

Implementation Phase

  • Impact assessment kept up-to-date as changes occur
  • Stakeholder engagement ongoing
  • Issues logged and tracked
  • Success metrics monitored

Post-Implementation Phase

  • Benefits realisation review
  • Lessons learned captured
  • Impact assessment archived for future reference

Impact Assessment Best Practices

Start Early: Conduct impact assessment during requirements phase (not after design) Involve Stakeholders: Don't assess in isolation; interview affected parties Be Realistic: Don't underestimate effort, cost, or resistance Quantify: Use numbers where possible (time, cost, FTE) Think End-to-End: Consider upstream and downstream impacts Document Assumptions: Make constraints and dependencies explicit Update Regularly: Impact assessment is living document, not one-time exercise Use for Governance: Present to approval bodies (exec committee, board)

Change Impact Rating Matrix

                  ORGANISATIONAL IMPACT

    HIGH    │  MAJOR CHANGE        │  TRANSFORMATIONAL
            │  (6-12 months)       │  (12-24 months)
            │                      │
COMPLEXITY │──────────────────────│─────────────────────
            │                      │
    LOW     │  MINOR CHANGE        │  MODERATE CHANGE
            │  (1-3 months)        │  (3-6 months)

                  LOW ─────────────► HIGH
                     TECHNICAL COMPLEXITY

Minor Change: Single system, limited users, low risk Moderate Change: Multiple systems, significant user impact Major Change: Cross-functional, org structure change, regulatory Transformational: Enterprise-wide, strategic, cultural shift

Next Steps

  1. Download this template
  2. Select a change to assess (system upgrade, process change, org restructure)
  3. Complete the impact assessment template
  4. Review with stakeholders
  5. Present to governance for approval
  6. Use assessment to inform implementation plan

Need Expert Support?

Managing complex change requires expertise in impact analysis, stakeholder engagement, and programme management. If you're facing a major transformation or regulatory change, contact our team for a consultation.


Template Version: 1.0 Last Updated: January 2025 Compatible With: ADKAR, Kotter, Prosci change management frameworks License: Free for commercial use with attribution