How to Design a Target Operating Model That Actually Gets Implemented
Every executive team wants a "Target Operating Model" (TOM). But 70% of TOMs fail to be implemented.
Here's why—and how to design one that actually drives change.
The Problem with Most TOMs
We've reviewed dozens of Target Operating Models. Most suffer from the same issues:
They're Too Theoretical
- Beautiful PowerPoint decks with org charts
- Generic "best practice" frameworks copied from consultants
- No connection to day-to-day operations
- Nobody can explain how to actually get there
They're Too Vague
- "Optimize operations" (what does that mean?)
- "Improve customer experience" (how?)
- "Enhance collaboration" (between who?)
- No measurable outcomes or success criteria
They Have No Roadmap
- Describes future state but no path to get there
- No prioritization of changes
- No implementation timeline
- No change management plan
Result: Expensive consulting project produces a document nobody uses.
What Makes a TOM Actually Work
A successful Target Operating Model has three essential components:
1. Clear Design Principles
Before designing your TOM, establish non-negotiable principles:
Example Principles:
- "Customer-facing teams make decisions without escalation for transactions under $10K"
- "All processes must have a single accountable owner (no shared accountability)"
- "Technology supports process, not the other way around"
- "Regional variations are minimized; global standardization is default"
- "Control functions (Risk, Compliance) are independent from operational teams"
These principles guide every design decision and prevent "design by committee" drift.
30-second video summary
2. Integrated Design Framework
A complete TOM addresses five dimensions simultaneously:
Dimension 1: Organization Structure
- Who reports to whom
- Span of control (ideal: 5-7 direct reports for managers)
- Centralized vs. decentralized functions
- Geographic vs. functional organization
Dimension 2: Process Architecture
- Core value streams (e.g., Quote-to-Cash, Order-to-Cash)
- Supporting processes (HR, Finance, IT)
- Process ownership model (who owns end-to-end)
- Service level agreements (SLAs) between functions
Dimension 3: Governance & Decision Rights
- Which decisions are made at what level
- Approval thresholds and limits
- Escalation paths for exceptions
- Governance forums (OpCo, SteerCo, RiskCo)
Dimension 4: Technology & Systems
- Application landscape (what systems support what processes)
- Data architecture (master data, integrations)
- Automation roadmap
- Legacy system retirement plan
Dimension 5: People & Capabilities
- Required skills for future state
- Gap analysis (current vs. required capabilities)
- Hiring, training, or outsourcing decisions
- Change management and adoption plan
Most TOMs only address Dimension 1 (org structure). That's why they fail.
3. 30/60/90 Day Implementation Roadmap
A TOM without a roadmap is just a wish list.
Phase 1: Quick Wins (Days 1-30)
- Low-complexity, high-impact changes
- Don't require system changes or restructuring
- Build momentum and credibility
Example:
- Clarify decision rights for existing roles (RACI)
- Eliminate one redundant approval layer
- Pilot new governance forum (weekly OpCo)
Phase 2: Foundation Building (Days 31-90)
- Process redesign for 3-5 critical processes
- Initial org structure changes (if any)
- Technology enablement projects kicked off
Example:
- Implement new procure-to-pay process
- Create shared service center for finance
- Launch pilot automation for invoice processing
Phase 3: Full Transformation (Days 91-180)
- Complete org restructuring (if required)
- Technology implementations (CRM, ERP, etc.)
- Scale successful pilots across organization
Real Example: Regional Bank TOM
Challenge:
- Broken handoffs between branches, operations, and risk
- Unclear accountability for customer issues
- 15% of transactions required manual intervention
- Failed regulatory review
TOM Design (8-week engagement):
Future-State Organization
- Created "Customer Operations" function (unified branch + ops)
- Separated first-line operations from second-line risk
- Clear RACI for all customer-facing processes
Process Architecture
- Redesigned account opening (end-to-end ownership)
- Documented exception handling for all processes
- Defined SLAs between functions
Governance Model
- Weekly Operational Committee (OpCo)
- Monthly Risk Committee (RiskCo)
- Quarterly Board-level reporting
Technology Roadmap
- Implement workflow automation (6 months)
- Upgrade core banking system (12 months)
- Retire 3 legacy applications (18 months)
Implementation Roadmap
- Month 1: RACI clarification, OpCo launch
- Month 2-3: Process redesign (5 processes)
- Month 4-6: Org structure transition
- Month 7-12: Technology implementations
Results (12 months):
- Manual intervention rate: 15% → 4%
- Customer complaint resolution: 5 days → 1 day
- Passed regulatory review with zero findings
- Employee engagement score increased 18 points
The TOM Design Process
Step 1: Current State Assessment (2-3 weeks)
- Document existing org structure
- Map current processes and pain points
- Identify capability gaps
- Analyze cost structure
Step 2: Future State Design (3-4 weeks)
- Workshop with leadership on design principles
- Design target org structure
- Map future-state processes
- Define governance model
- Create technology roadmap
Step 3: Gap Analysis & Roadmap (1-2 weeks)
- Compare AS-IS vs. TO-BE
- Prioritize changes by impact and complexity
- Create 30/60/90/180-day roadmap
- Estimate costs and resource needs
Step 4: Change Impact Assessment (1 week)
- Who is affected by changes
- Resistance management strategies
- Communication plan
- Training requirements
Common TOM Mistakes to Avoid
Mistake #1: Starting with Org Charts
Most TOMs start by drawing new org charts. Wrong approach.
Right Approach: Start with process architecture, then design org structure to support it.
Mistake #2: Ignoring Technology Constraints
Designing a TOM that requires $10M in new systems without acknowledging budget constraints.
Right Approach: Design multiple scenarios (minimal tech change vs. full modernization) with cost-benefit.
Mistake #3: No Ownership Clarity
Creating "shared" or "matrix" accountability for critical processes.
Right Approach: Every process has ONE owner who is accountable end-to-end.
Mistake #4: Too Much Change at Once
Trying to restructure, implement new systems, and change all processes simultaneously.
Right Approach: Phase implementation with quick wins first, then tackle complex changes.
Your TOM Checklist
Before finalizing your Target Operating Model, ensure:
Design Principles: Do we have clear, agreed-upon principles?
All 5 Dimensions: Have we addressed org structure, process, governance, technology, and people?
Clear Accountability: Does every critical process have a single owner?
Measurable Outcomes: Can we quantify success (error rates, cycle times, costs)?
Implementation Roadmap: Do we have a phased plan with specific dates?
Change Management: Do we have a plan to manage resistance and drive adoption?
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Have we quantified investment required and expected ROI?
Regulatory Alignment: Does our TOM meet regulatory expectations for governance?
Need Help Designing Your TOM?
Most organizations struggle with TOM design because:
- Lack of experience with operating model frameworks
- Internal politics make objective design difficult
- Unclear how to prioritize competing requirements
- No bandwidth to dedicate internal resources
Complimentary: Share your current organizational challenges. We'll provide an executive assessment of TOM design opportunities.
Consulting Engagement: We deliver complete Target Operating Models (all 5 dimensions) with 30/60/90-day implementation roadmaps in 6-10 weeks.
Ready to do the structural work?
Our AI Enablement engagements are built around the five pillars in this article. We start with a focused diagnostic, then redesign one priority workflow end-to-end as proof — including the data layer, decision rights, and governance machinery.
Explore the AI Enablement serviceMore like this — once a month
Get the next long-form essay on AI enablement, embedded governance, and operating-model design straight to your inbox. One considered piece per month, written for senior practitioners in regulated industries.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read by senior practitioners across FS, healthcare, energy, and the public sector.
Related insights

Solving the "Who Does What" Problem: The RACI Matrix in FinTech
Eliminate role ambiguity and improve decision-making speed in your financial organization using the RACI model. A guide for COOs and Project Managers.
November 15, 2025Blueprinting Growth: Designing a Target Operating Model (TOM)
Learn how to design a Target Operating Model (TOM) that aligns your people, processes, and technology with your strategic goals for scalable growth.
November 05, 2025AI Model Risk Management Under PRA SS1/23: What COOs and CROs Actually Need to Do
A practical guide to managing AI model risk under PRA SS1/23 for banking and insurance leaders. Covers the supervisory expectations, the model lifecycle, and the governance machinery that satisfies the PRA on first reading.
April 10, 2026